Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Paying Big For The Small Screen


I know what it's like to live check to check. 

Hell, I've been doing it every two weeks for the last 10 years or so.  You can imagine how disheartening of an experience it is each of the two times a month I open up my paycheck and see how little I'm being paid.   Or how much was taken away from me in taxes.

Now, imagine what it's like when I receive my cable bill every month.

Having trouble?  Let me help you.  It's more than disheartening.  It's just heartbreaking.   My cable bill (which, for the purposes of full disclosure, comes from Comcast) is so expensive that after I open it, I start to quiver with concern over how I'm going to pay for it.   Sort of like the quiver you see in a movie where a poor,desitute single mother of 7 gets fired, has no savings, needs food and owes rent all on the same day.   

It's sad isn't it?

Listen, I'm fully aware that after considering the current world situation, it might seem a little frivolous to bring up the high cost of my cable bill.  Cable service costs could easily run secondary to hundreds of issues, if not thousands.  But, like any other topic worth talking about, the Mayor of Boston has brought this one up and I'm just offering further comment.  Alright I'm kidding about Menino being the source of all good topics, but he is responsible for bringing this issue to the public setting.

If you haven't heard, Comcast is planning to increase the price for their basic cable bundle yet again.  In response, Mayor Menino has said, "Nowiajfiwh;hfwejakfdh afjda;klfhdajkhf".  Which in mumble, means, "Think again, Comcast."

Menino got in touch with the FCC to try to restore the regulatory control he had in the late 90's and early 2000's over cable prices in the city.   That regulatory control expired in 2001 and since then the cable companies have been free to compete with eachother by charging what they wanted.  The problem is, these cable companies are not even competing anymore.  Their content is, for all intents and purposes, exactly the same and almost exactly the same in price with only a small variance of a dollar or two.

We don't have many options anymore.  I'm pretty positive there isn't a wicked cheap, generic cable service that exists out there.  Unless Magic Jack or Vonage have entered the cable sector and I haven't been aware, I'm stuck paying an absurb amount of cash to watch television. 

Here are the facts: Comcast has almost doubled their rates for basic cable packages in the last 5 years alone.  That is an amazing markup, especially for something that has stayed exactly the same during those 5 years.   

On some level, I'm against the city regulating what private companies charge the public.  Where else could this power extend to in the future?  It's a scary thought.  But at the same time, I am so sick of being being poor just so I can watch some god damn Jersey Shore.



The Greatest Neighborhood






Thursday, October 13, 2011

What The F*** Is Going On?

I feel like I don't even know how to begin.

I am certain that I will sit here for at least an hour, staring at this blank page, wondering how to get all of my baseball thoughts into one cohesive post.   There is so much stuff happening with the Sox - bad stuff - that I run the risk of sounding as coherent as a downtown bar room at 1 a.m. on a Saturday night.

One hour later

So...Tito's gone.  Now Theo's gone. 

Anybody else? Looks like that's going to be the case. 

Instead of playing 9 innings of playoff baseball every other day, the Red Sox players, the ownership and front office are involved in the worst round of the blame-game I've ever witnessed. 

The truth is, there are a lot of people to blame.  But for me, the forefront of that blame goes to the owners. 

As Dan Shaughnessy wrote in the Globe this morning:
Apologies are in order, all around. John Henry, Tom Werner, and Larry Lucchino need to come out of hiding and say they are sorry for this embarrassment.


(By the way, kudos to Dan Shaughnessy for that piece today)

The fact is, these owners have lost their god damn minds. 

Francona talked about not feeling as though the ownership had his back at many points throughout the season.  Larry Luchinno said he was confused by that statement. 

Really Larry?  Really? 

Not even a month after Tito parts ways with the team -- which by the way was done in a very classy and proper way -- the Globe publishes a report that leaks information regarding his possible marriage issues followed by a really serious accusation that he was abusing pain medication. 

I really hate to agree with Curth Schilling, but he's right.  This leak came from the top.  The Globe article states that claims came from a source within the organization.  Should we assume that it came from someone on the low end of the Sox totem-pole?  No.  We shouldn't.

Schilling was right on a few other points as well. No one is going to want to return to this organization after seeing that the ownership is in the business of selling "rag-mag" stories to local media outlets. 

The statements about Tito never should have been made.  It was backstabbing and vile to hear something like that spewed about a man who has done as much as he has for this team. He gave 8 years of his life to the Red Sox.  He pushed harder than anyone else ever has.  And what did he get in return?

It's like being forced to leave a house party early and then find out the next day that the people who threw the party spread rumors about you to
everyone there.

Is it just a coincedence that Theo hightailed it out of Landsdowne as soon as he did?  No way.  He had to work the closest, out of anybody, with those three vomits and I'm sure he couldn't stand it anymore.

Let's be honest. These owners are businessmen.  Yeah, most owners are businessmen, but our guys...they don't even care about baseball. 

Car racing and European football mean squat to the people of Boston, especially this Red Sox fan.  That just shows you how out of touch John Henry and his two fellow Stooges are. 
Wednesday, October 5, 2011

Adrian Beltre Has Left The Building

 .
Three times actually. Thank you, god.

I am well aware that it's the trait of a sore loser to gloat at the loss of others, but frankly, I don't give a shit. Let me just say that I am nothing but happy and filled with joy that Beltre and the rest of the Texas Ranger crew sent the Rays home early.

I don't want to hear any of this, "Oh the Rays were a better team than us, so you shouldn't be so hostile towards them going to the postseason." or "Why would you want the Rays to lose? They deserve to be in the playoffs." 

You know what I say to that? BS.  That kind of talk is for losers.  It's reserved for people who don't care whether they win or lose. 

The Rays were not the better team.  It's laughable to even consider that notion. Their arrival into the playoffs was a fluke.  They never deserved to be there.  Yes, they got there fair and square. Fine.  But they didn't get there because they were an unstoppable force during the entire year and cemented a playoff berth by August.  They played well in the last 3 week stretch when the Red Sox were self-destructing, and that is the only reason they made it there. 

The Yankees, on the other hand, deserve to be in the playoffs. They were in second place for most of the year, but never too far behind the Sox.  Also, there weren't times when they let their lead in the Wild Card drop to anything that was worthy of sounding the alarms.  There was no fluke in them making the playoffs.  They won their spot outright.

For me, It's never a great feeling to win simply because someone else was bad.  It's like being second choice. Imagine being offered tickets to a game by your buddy only because his cooler friend died.

Of course, it's not as if the Rays could just step aside and say, "No thank you.  We'll skip the playoffs, since we shouldn't really be here."  But again, it's important to note why I'm happy they lost.  

So the Rays are going home and I'm glad, because they shouldn't have seen October baseball anyway. 

See you next season boys.
Tuesday, October 4, 2011

Born On The 4th of July, Not Yesterday

Tom Cruise captivated audiences and gave a seriously convincing performance as a down-and-out Marine veteran returning from the Vietnam War in Oliver Stone's, "Born On the Fourth of July".  The role earned Tommy boy Oscar and Golden Globe nominations for Best Actor.     

It's been 22 years since the film was released, but it still seems to be inspiring people. 

How so?  Well, take a gander at the idiot in the picture to the right.  His name is unknown.  At first glance, he looks like a solider in civilian clothes.  Sort of like an off-duty cop.  Along with his neat jeans and button down shirt, he has a set of army issued fatigues lying in between the army issued boots he is wearing, topped off with an army issued duffle bag on his back. 

If you notice, he sits there with his hand over his face and his head facing towards the ground.  Basic intuition should help you recognize what this looks like.  It looks like a guy who is sad. Melancholy has filled his spirit.  Stricken with the case of the Mondays.  Do you want to know why?  Because he lost his wallet and now he doesn't have enough money to take the train back home. 

Hold it.

Before you start looking for this creep on the streets to go and shower him with your spare change and compassion, let me fill you in on a little secret. 

Take away the Hollywood lifestyle, Katie Holmes, and Scientology, this guy is exactly the same as Tom Cruise in that he is only acting as a soldier.  That's right.  This jerk is telling people that he is a solider who is trying to get home, but can't because his wallet was stolen along with his laptop bag.  The only reason we know this is all a ruse is because this schmuck has just enough stupidity to pull the same gag, in the same spot, multiple days in a row.  So now, the people who fell for his trick in the days or weeks before, are seeing him begging in the same spot dishing out the same story. 

Now this guy won't ever win an Oscar, but according to a woman named Amanda, who was interviewed by The Metro and also someone who fell into the faux soldiers trap, "he deserves an Emmy for his performance." 

Amanda says she gave the man some money to get home because she felt like he was telling the truth.  Then, a week later, she saw him at the same T station in the same clothes, giving someone the same sob story he told her.  As she walked by she lambasted the phony soldier and warned the new victim, who was most likely on her way to being bamboozled as well, that he was a thief.

I've lived in Boston my whole life and so I've seen just about every trick in the book when it comes to panhandling.  I've got a talent for picking out these bogus stories and I can guarantee I would not have fallen for this trick.   But I don't expect everyone to be able to do that.  Some people, on top of having a bleeding heart, are just not familiar with the ever expanding tactics that Boston's scumbags use to get big bucks off of passers by. 

So here's a suggestion to all you do-gooder Samaritans out there.  If someone like the guy above stops you and begs you for cash so that he can buy a ticket home and you desperately want to help him, then walk him into the station and buy him the ticket yourself.

If that's too much work for you, then don't bother.
Loading...
Photobucket

Enter your email address:

Loading...
Powered by Blogger.

Popular Posts